docs(README): roadmap section shaped by integrator reviews

Add a community-driven roadmap: cross-device parameter consistency check
(feasibility validated by a PoC on real 42-275-device projects — find the odd
thermostat/sensor out; not yet shipped), a Project Policy Profile, and an
honest note that in-ETS GA linking is left to existing add-ins / ETS7 Smart
Linking while we focus on read-only audit + an evidential model.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nikolay1
2026-07-14 21:39:49 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent bb608af0b0
commit 546d71ec2b
+12
View File
@@ -74,6 +74,18 @@ issue. The tool is read-only and never connects to a bus, so testing is safe (se
---
## 🗺️ Roadmap — shaped by real integrators
Recent reviews from practising KNX integrators (in [Discussions](https://github.com/NickoScope/nickol-knx-mcp/discussions)) are steering what comes next:
- **Cross-device parameter consistency** *(feasibility validated by a PoC — not yet a shipped tool)* — flag the one device whose ETS **parameter** settings differ from its N identical siblings: a thermostat with a different setpoint/hysteresis, a presence detector with a different detection time. The PoC extracts per-device parameters straight from the `.knxproj` and finds the odd one out on real 42–275-device projects — read-only, no ETS, no bus — and correctly reports **nothing** on a clean project (no false positives across a different vendor / integrator school).
- **Project Policy Profile** — validate a project against *your own* agreed rules (naming, GA taxonomy, command/status exemptions) instead of one universal "professional standard", since conventions differ per integrator.
- On **in-ETS group-address linking** we deliberately *don't* reinvent the wheel: for linking GAs to communication objects inside ETS there are already ETS App-Store add-ins today, and native **Smart Linking** is coming in ETS7 — we point you to those and keep our focus on read-only **audit** and an **evidential project model**.
Have a project to test, a workflow that breaks, or a feature to shape? → **[Discussions](https://github.com/NickoScope/nickol-knx-mcp/discussions)**.
---
## Why this exists
As of mid-2026 there is **no off-the-shelf ETS6 ↔ Claude / MCP tool**. The KNX community has