* Allow Docker image to take parameters to overwrite unittest
execution
* Add documentation for running individual tests
* Fixed String encoding in Patorni state check and error case
* Lazy upgrade now properly covered with eventual and waiting for pod
start
* patching config now updates deployment, patching annotation, allowing
to trace change step
* run.sh no takes NOCLEANUP to stop kind from being deleted
* if kind config is present, run will not install kind
* Fast e2e local execution now possible once kind is up
* Lookup function installation
Due to reusing a previous database connection without closing it, lookup
function installation process was skipping the first database in the
list, installing twice into postgres db instead. To prevent that, make
internal initDbConnWithName to overwrite a connection object, and return
the same object only from initDbConn, which is sort of public interface.
Another solution for this would be to modify initDbConnWithName to
return a connection object and then generate one temporary connection
for each db. It sound feasible but after one attempt it seems it
requires a bit more changes around (init, close connections) and
doesn't bring anything significantly better on the table. In case if
some future changes will prove this wrong, do not hesitate to refactor.
Change retry strategy to more insistive one, namely:
* retry on the next sync even if we failed to process one database and
install pooler appliance.
* perform the whole installation unconditionally on update, since the
list of target databases could be changed.
And for the sake of making it even more robust, also log the case when
operator decides to skip installation.
Extend connection pooler e2e test with verification that all dbs have
required schema installed.
* icnrease vm size
* cache deps
* switch to the absolute cache path as cdp does not support shell expansion
* do not pull non-existing image
* manually install kind
* add alias to kind
* use full kind name
* one more name change
* install kind with other tools
* add bind mounts instead of copying files
* test fetching the runner image
* build image for pierone
* bump up the client-go version to match the master
* bump up go version
* install pinned version of kind before any test run
* do not overwrite local ./manifests during test run
* update the docs
* fix kind name
* update go.* files
* fix deps
* avoid unnecessary image upload
* properly install kind
* Change network to host to make it reachable within e2e runner. May not be the right solution though.
* Small changes. Also use entrypoint vs cmd.
* Bumping spilo. Load before test.
* undo incorrect merge from the master
Co-authored-by: Sergey Dudoladov <sergey.dudoladov@zalando.de>
Co-authored-by: Jan Mußler <janm81@gmail.com>
* update kind and use with old storage class
* specify standard storage class in minimal manifest
* remove existing local storage class in kind
* fix pod distribution test
* exclude k8s master from nodes of interest
* allow using both infrastructure_roles_options
* new default values for user and role definition
* use robot_zmon as parent role
* add operator log to debug
* right name for old secret
* only extract if rolesDefs is empty
* set password1 in old infrastructure role
* fix new infra rile secret
* choose different role key for new secret
* set memberof everywhere
* reenable all tests
* reflect feedback
* remove condition for rolesDefs
Extend infrastructure roles handling
Postgres Operator uses infrastructure roles to provide access to a database for
external users e.g. for monitoring purposes. Such infrastructure roles are
expected to be present in the form of k8s secrets with the following content:
inrole1: some_encrypted_role
password1: some_encrypted_password
user1: some_entrypted_name
inrole2: some_encrypted_role
password2: some_encrypted_password
user2: some_entrypted_name
The format of this content is implied implicitly and not flexible enough. In
case if we do not have possibility to change the format of a secret we want to
use in the Operator, we need to recreate it in this format.
To address this lets make the format of secret content explicitly. The idea is
to introduce a new configuration option for the Operator.
infrastructure_roles_secrets:
- secretname: k8s_secret_name
userkey: some_encrypted_name
passwordkey: some_encrypted_password
rolekey: some_encrypted_role
- secretname: k8s_secret_name
userkey: some_encrypted_name
passwordkey: some_encrypted_password
rolekey: some_encrypted_role
This would allow Operator to use any avalable secrets to prepare infrastructure
roles. To make it backward compatible simulate the old behaviour if the new
option is not present.
The new configuration option is intended be used mainly from CRD, but it's also
available via Operator ConfigMap in a limited fashion. For ConfigMap one can
put there only a string with one secret definition in the following format (as
a string):
infrastructure_roles_secrets: |
secretname: k8s_secret_name,
userkey: some_encrypted_name,
passwordkey: some_encrypted_password,
rolekey: some_encrypted_role
Note than only one secret could be specified this way, no multiple secrets are
allowed.
Eventually the resulting list of infrastructure roles would be a total sum of
all supported ways to describe it, namely legacy via
infrastructure_roles_secret_name and infrastructure_roles_secrets from both
ConfigMap and CRD.
* Initial commit
* Corrections
- set the type of the new configuration parameter to be array of
strings
- propagate the annotations to statefulset at sync
* Enable regular expression matching
* Improvements
-handle rollingUpdate flag
-modularize code
-rename config parameter name
* fix merge error
* Pass annotations to connection pooler deployment
* update code-gen
* Add documentation and update manifests
* add e2e test and introduce option in configmap
* fix service annotations test
* Add unit test
* fix e2e tests
* better key lookup of annotations tests
* add debug message for annotation tests
* Fix typos
* minor fix for looping
* Handle update path and renaming
- handle the update path to update sts and connection pooler deployment.
This way no need to wait for sync
- rename the parameter to downscaler_annotations
- handle other review comments
* another try to fix python loops
* Avoid unneccessary update events
* Update manifests
* some final polishing
* fix cluster_test after polishing
Co-authored-by: Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@zalando.de>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kunde <felix-kunde@gmx.de>
* initial implementation
* describe forcing the rolling upgrade
* make parameter name more descriptive
* add missing pieces
* address review
* address review
* fix bug in e2e tests
* fix cluster name label in e2e test
* raise test timeout
* load spilo test image
* use available spilo image
* delete replica pod for lazy update test
* fix e2e
* fix e2e with a vengeance
* lets wait for another 30m
* print pod name in error msg
* print pod name in error msg 2
* raise timeout, comment other tests
* subsequent updates of config
* add comma
* fix e2e test
* run unit tests before e2e
* remove conflicting dependency
* Revert "remove conflicting dependency"
This reverts commit 65fc09054b.
* improve cdp build
* dont run unit before e2e tests
* Revert "improve cdp build"
This reverts commit e2a8fa12aa.
Co-authored-by: Sergey Dudoladov <sergey.dudoladov@zalando.de>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kunde <felix-kunde@gmx.de>
* adds a Get call to Patroni interface to fetch state of a Patroni member
* postpones re-creating pods if at least one replica is currently being created
Co-authored-by: Sergey Dudoladov <sergey.dudoladov@zalando.de>
Co-authored-by: Felix Kunde <felix-kunde@gmx.de>
Connection pooler support
Add support for a connection pooler. The idea is to make it generic enough to
be able to switch between different implementations (e.g. pgbouncer or
odyssey). Operator needs to create a deployment with pooler and a service for
it to access.
For connection pool to work properly, a database needs to be prepared by
operator, namely a separate user have to be created with an access to an
installed lookup function (to fetch credential for other users).
This setups is supposed to be used only by robot/application users. Usually a
connection pool implementation is more CPU bounded, so it makes sense to create
several pods for connection pool with more emphasize on cpu resources. At the
moment there are no special affinity or tolerations assigned to bring those
pods closer to the database. For availability purposes minimal number of
connection pool pods is 2, ideally they have to be distributed between
different nodes/AZ, but it's not enforced in the operator itself. Available
configuration supposed to be ergonomic and in the normal case require minimum
changes to a manifest to enable connection pool. To have more control over the
configuration and functionality on the pool side one can customize the
corresponding docker image.
Co-authored-by: Felix Kunde <felix-kunde@gmx.de>
Jan Mußler
Dmitry Dolgov
Sergey Dudoladov
Felix Kunde
Rafia Sabih