Phase 1 project revival + PR fixes (#207, #209, #213)

Project infrastructure:
- Replace MIT license with AGPL-3.0 (KSA Technologies, LLC)
- Full README rewrite with badges, compatibility table, token auth docs
- Add CHANGELOG, CONTRIBUTING, DONORS, SECURITY docs
- Add GitHub issue/PR templates, update FUNDING.yml and stale.yml
- Replace external packer repo dispatch with self-contained CI (build.yml)
- Add packaging/DEBIAN/ with postinst/postrm/triggers (no git clone at install)
- Add .perlcriticrc for static analysis
- Add .claude/cos/ ADRs, plans, and runbooks

Bug fixes from community PRs:
- Fix bearer token check in freenas_api_connect: defined() && value instead of
  defined() alone, so truenas_token_auth=0 no longer activates Bearer Token auth (#207)
- Fix LUN 0 falsy bug in ZFSPlugin patch: !$guid -> !defined $guid in both
  zfs_get_lun_number and zfs_get_wwid_number, fixing VMs on LUN 0 for PVE 9 (#209)
- Fix syslog typo "wtih" -> "with" in run_list_extent (#213)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+---
+name: Bug Report
+about: Report a problem with the plugin
+title: "[BUG] "
+labels: bug
+assignees: TheGrandWazoo
+---
+
+## Environment
+
+| Component | Version |
+|-----------|---------|
+| Plugin (`dpkg -l freenas-proxmox`) | |
+| Proxmox VE (`pveversion`) | |
+| TrueNAS type | CORE / SCALE |
+| TrueNAS version | |
+| Authentication method | Token / Password |
+
+## Description
+
+A clear description of what the bug is.
+
+## Steps to Reproduce
+
+1. 
+2. 
+3. 
+
+## Expected Behavior
+
+What you expected to happen.
+
+## Actual Behavior
+
+What actually happened.
+
+## Relevant Log Output
+
+Run the following on your Proxmox node and paste the output:
+
+```bash
+grep -i freenas /var/log/syslog | tail -50
+```
+
+```
+(paste log output here)
+```
+
+## Storage Configuration
+
+Paste your storage config entry from `/etc/pve/storage.cfg` — **redact any passwords or API tokens**:
+
+```
+(paste config here, credentials redacted)
+```
+
+## Additional Context
+
+Any other information that might help: network topology, multipath, multiple Proxmox nodes, etc.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+---
+name: Feature Request
+about: Suggest an improvement or new capability
+title: "[FEATURE] "
+labels: enhancement
+assignees: TheGrandWazoo
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+A brief, clear description of the feature you'd like.
+
+## Problem It Solves
+
+What use case does this address? What problem does it solve for you?
+
+## Proposed Solution
+
+How do you envision this working? Any specific API endpoints, UI changes, or behaviors in mind?
+
+## Alternatives Considered
+
+Any workarounds you've tried, or alternative approaches you've considered.
+
+## Environment
+
+| Component | Version |
+|-----------|---------|
+| Proxmox VE | |
+| TrueNAS type | CORE / SCALE |
+| TrueNAS version | |
+
+## Additional Context
+
+Screenshots, links to TrueNAS API docs, or any other information.