mirror of
https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git
synced 2026-09-30 19:21:33 +02:00
maziggy
df5aa04df1
The dialog weighed each plate against the spool in the slot it mapped to and knew nothing about AMS Filament Backup, so a two-plate job needing 1441 g of ABS was refused against a 1000 g spool while the identical full spool in the next slot went uncounted. The dispatcher has pooled matching spools since #1762 and would have run the print -- "Print anyway" was always the right answer to this warning. The rule for which spools back each other up now lives in one place: build_slot_materials() in filament_deficit, which the dispatcher's pool and the new slot_materials half of GET /printers/{id}/inventory-remain both draw on. The dialog groups on the keys it is handed rather than resolving spools a second time, which is what let the two answers drift apart, and which also gives the check to Spoolman users -- it read the internal inventory only, so in Spoolman mode it approved everything. Where a pool really is short the warning quotes the pooled totals, since the per-slot figure reads as a contradiction next to a full peer spool.