mirror of
https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git
synced 2026-09-30 11:12:35 +02:00
maziggy
89ea337612
(#2843 follow-up) Bambuddy records the project_file behind every print, because that command names where the sliced file was put and so decides whether the archive can have a thumbnail and slicer metadata at all. Its own dispatches were told apart from a slicer's by testing sequence_id against "20000", on the belief that 20000 was Bambuddy's alone. It never was. 20000 is the slicer convention Bambuddy copied -- virtual_printer/bind_server documents the slicer sending exactly that during detect -- and both slicers count up from it. Measured on the wire: OrcaSlicer dispatched 20000 and then 20001, BambuStudio 20009 and 20010. So whichever dispatch happened to land on the shared value was filed as ours and never recorded, and after a slicer restart that is the first print you send. The test was wrong in the other direction too: it called every value above 20000 external, including ones we had sent ourselves, which only stayed invisible because we always send exactly 20000. Ownership is now established by remembering the job actually dispatched -- sequence id, file, url and subtask name -- and consuming that marker on the echo. One-shot deliberately: a slicer reprint of the same file a moment later is somebody else's print and must not hide behind our last one. Nothing about printing or archiving changes. current_project_url and ams_mapping are both captured before this branch and always were, so the storage verdict that gates the FTPS sweep is untouched; two tests pin that, because it is the part that would actually cost archives if it drifted. What changes is that the diagnostic entry stops lying, and it is the entry that tells an operator whether their printer stores files somewhere Bambuddy can read -- which is the whole subject of #2780 and would have to count, and an undercount there would have been silent.