mirror of
https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git
synced 2026-09-30 11:12:35 +02:00
maziggy
c0c07bc509
When the user re-sliced an H2D archive for X1C, the new archive card and
reprint modal both showed the source printer's name (e.g. "Workshop H2C")
even though sliced_for_model on the same row correctly read "X1C".
slice_and_persist_as_archive copied source_archive.printer_id verbatim
onto the new PrintArchive row. Both the archive card
(ArchivesPage.tsx:3571) and the reprint modal read printer_id first and
only fall back to sliced_for_model when it's None. With printer_id set
to the source's H2D printer, neither could see that the new file is for
a different model.
Same shape as the sliced_for_model fix already in the same function — a
cross-model re-slice means the source's physical printer isn't where
this output prints anymore. When the slicer-baked target model differs
from source_archive.sliced_for_model, drop printer_id so both surfaces
fall back to the sliced_for_model badge ("X1C"). Same-model re-slices
keep printer_id so the reprint modal still pre-selects the source
printer.
Edge case: when source_archive.sliced_for_model is None (older archives
that predate that column being populated), we can't tell whether this
is a cross-model re-slice. Fail open and preserve printer_id rather
than spuriously nulling it.
slice_and_persist (the library-file path) doesn't have this bug —
LibraryFile has no printer_id column.
Tests in TestSliceArchiveResliceModel cover all three branches: cross-
model nulls printer_id; same-model keeps it; unknown source model
preserves it.
Surfaced via the bambuddy demo doing H2D -> X1C re-slices after the
.bbscfg System-tier slicing fix landed.