The dialog weighed each plate against the spool in the slot it mapped to
and knew nothing about AMS Filament Backup, so a two-plate job needing
1441 g of ABS was refused against a 1000 g spool while the identical full
spool in the next slot went uncounted. The dispatcher has pooled matching
spools since #1762 and would have run the print -- "Print anyway" was
always the right answer to this warning.
The rule for which spools back each other up now lives in one place:
build_slot_materials() in filament_deficit, which the dispatcher's pool
and the new slot_materials half of GET /printers/{id}/inventory-remain
both draw on. The dialog groups on the keys it is handed rather than
resolving spools a second time, which is what let the two answers drift
apart, and which also gives the check to Spoolman users -- it read the
internal inventory only, so in Spoolman mode it approved everything.
Where a pool really is short the warning quotes the pooled totals, since
the per-slot figure reads as a contradiction next to a full peer spool.
maziggy
df5aa04df1