mirror of
https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git
synced 2026-09-30 19:21:33 +02:00
maziggy
607b34e94d
A print's dispatch says where the printer put the sliced file: ftp://<name> for external storage, brtc://emmc/<name> for internal. Since that there is then no file to find at any path. That is where the printer chose to put it, which is not the same as where port 990 can read it. The reporter's H2D - firmware 01.03.00.00, card in the slot - reports brtc://emmc and keeps the same file under /cache: his log has every print from 08-12 downloading from there, 19 MB included, until the skip landed and two days of archives came out as a name and nothing else. #2780's P2S and H2C really did 550 on every path, so both are true and the URL alone cannot tell them apart. So ask the printer rather than the model. The dispatch names the exact file, which turns the question into one connection walking five directories - against the sweep's ~110, which is the cost that made skipping worth doing. A hit archives normally and is shared with the cover endpoint; a miss keeps #2780's fallback archive and its reason, so the archives banner still explains itself. Not probed when the printer reports an empty slot, or while its file service is in TLS cool-off: both have already answered the question. The connection diagnostic asked the same question off the URL and warned that the last print was out of reach. On this reporter's printer that warning would have sent him to a setting that was already right, so it now probes too - by directory listing, since the file it is asking about can be tens of megabytes and the answer is a yes or a no. Capped at 6s to stay inside the support bundle's per-printer budget, and "could not check" leaves the warning standing. The probe filename arrives over MQTT and becomes both a remote path and a local temp filename, so names carrying separators, traversal or control characters are declined rather than cleaned.