Spec.Replicas is the count the listener asked for when it published
Spec.PatchID. When the EphemeralRunnerSet controller cleaned up finished
runners in the same reconcile, it then compared that count against a live
count the cleanup had just reduced, and created runners to replace jobs
that had already completed. Nobody asked for those runners.
Delete the finished runners, record the patch ID the cleanup belongs to in
Status.FinishedRunnerCleanupPatchID, and return, so the scaling decision is
made on the next reconcile against post-cleanup data. Scale up stays
suppressed while Spec.PatchID still equals that recorded patch ID: the gap
below Spec.Replicas is the one the cleanup opened, not new demand. The
listener marks itself dirty on every job completion and publishes a fresh
incrementing patch ID, so the suppression lifts as soon as it reports a
desired state that accounts for the completions.
Runners that are mid-deletion were not counted at all, which let the
controller over-create while deletions were still in flight. Count them
towards the scale-up total.
The cleanup helper is renamed to deleteTerminatedEphemeralRunners because
it is no longer specific to finished runners.
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
When the AutoscalingRunnerSet's runner spec changes, the EphemeralRunnerSet
has to delete its idle and pending runners so they are rebuilt from the new
spec. That was detected by hashing Spec.EphemeralRunnerSpec into the
actions.github.com/integrity-hash annotation and comparing the annotation
against a freshly computed hash.
Replace it with a monotonic revision counter split across spec and status.
The AutoscalingRunnerSet controller bumps Spec.ActionableRevision when it
patches a new runner spec across; the EphemeralRunnerSet controller advances
Status.AppliedActionableRevision only after the cleanup has actually
succeeded. Because the applied marker lives in status and is written last, a
controller that crashes part-way through the cleanup comes back with the
applied revision still behind the spec revision and redoes the work, instead
of skipping runners that are still running the old spec.
The drift check uses apiequality.Semantic.DeepEqual rather than cmp.Equal or
reflect.DeepEqual. Most PodSpec collection fields carry omitempty, so a
template containing an explicitly empty value (`env: []`) is dropped when the
EphemeralRunnerSet is written and reads back as nil. A strict comparison would
report drift on every reconcile, bump the revision each time, and delete every
idle and pending runner forever. helpers_drift_test.go pins that behaviour with
a round-trip-through-JSON test.
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
