* Add workflow for validating runner scripts with shellcheck
I am about to revisit #1517, #1454, #1561, and #1560 as a part of our on-going effort to a major enhancement to the runner entrypoints being made in #1759.
This change is a counterpart of #1852. #1852 enables you to easily run shellcheck locally. This enables you to automatically run shellcheck on every pull request.
Currently, any shellcheck error does not result in failing the workflow job. Once we addressed all the shellcheck findings, we can flip the fail_on_error option to true and let jobs start failing on pull requests that introduce invalid or suspicious bash code.
so that ARC respect the registration timeout, terminationGracePeriodSeconds and RUNNER_GRACEFUL_STOP_TIMEOUT(#1759) when the runner pod was terminated externally too early after its creation
While I was running E2E tests for #1759, I discovered a potential issue that ARC can terminate runner pods without waiting for the registration timeout of 10 minutes.
You won't be affected by this in normal circumstances, as this failure scenario can be triggered only when you or another K8s controller like cluster-autoscaler deleted the runner or the runner pod immediately after the runner or the runner pod has been created. But probably is it worth fixing it anyway because it's not impossible to trigger it?
* Update detailed-docs.md
Quick start instructions are now inline in README.md. Updating the link to point to the `Getting Started` section of README.md
* Update Actions-Runner-Controller-Overview.md
Quick start instructions are now inline in README.md. Updating the link to point to the `Getting Started` section of README.md
* Delete QuickStartGuide.md
This guide is no longer needed as the details of it are merged with README.md.
I am about to revisit #1517, #1454, #1561, and #1560 as a part of our on-going effort for a major enhancement to the runner entrypoints being made in #1759.
This commit adds the makefile target to run shellformat locally, so that any contributor can use it before submitting a pull request.
I am about to revisit #1517, #1454, #1561, and #1560 as a part of our on-going effort for a major enhancement to the runner entrypoints being made in #1759.
This change updates and reintroduces #1517 contributed by @CASABECI in a way it becomes applicable to today's code-base.
Both fields can be useless when the reporter thought only one or two lines of the respective logs are relevant and it turned out we had to see another line later.
To avoid such a situation I'd like to change the field labels to include `Whole` so that it looks like `Whole Runner Pod Logs`, and ask to not omit the logs in the field description.
Honestly, I'm a bit tired of seeing issues filed with the default title "Bug" that are seemingly not related to real bugs!
I'm emptying it so that the reporter is more encourage to write up a sentence to describe the problem and they hopefully notice along the way that there are places to diagnose before considering it as a bug.
* Update with recent changes from README.md
* Update README.md
This is the final phase of simplifying README.md
- include only Getting started` steps ( These steps were earlier reviewed as part of /docs/QuickStartGuide.md)
- links to a detailed documentation ( the detailed documentation is a copy of the current README.md)
Once this is merged, any new detailed docs should be captured in /docs/detailed-docs.md
* Update detailed-docs.md
Redo the change made in #1873
Co-authored-by: Yusuke Kuoka <ykuoka@gmail.com>
Fixes: #942
helm charts for actions runner, currently its having only RunnerDeployment and Autoscaler resources.
Looks like deployment order is important here, facing the below issue if Autoscaler deployed first and then autoscaling not working as expected.
```
2022-04-21T12:13:08Z DEBUG controllers.webhookbasedautoscaler RunnerDeployment not found with scale target ref name test-actions-runner for hra test-actions-runner-autoscaler
```
Helm doesn't support [ordering](https://github.com/helm/helm/issues/8439) for custom resources. So using List to overcome this issue, didn't use helm chart hooks for ordering since its not [tracked](https://helm.sh/docs/topics/charts_hooks/#hook-resources-are-not-managed-with-corresponding-releases) after creation.
Co-authored-by: Josh Feierman <joshua.feierman@warnermedia.com>
Co-authored-by: Yusuke Kuoka <ykuoka@gmail.com>
* feat: Add container to propagate host network MTU
Some network environments use non-standard MTU values. In these
situations, the `DockerMTU` setting might be used to specify the MTU
setting for the `bridge` network created by Docker. However, when the
Github Actions workflow creates networks, it doesn't propagate the
`bridge` network MTU which can lead to `connection reset by peer`
messages.
To overcome this, I've created a new docker image called
`summerwind/actions-runner-mtu` that shims the docker binary in order to
propagate the MTU setting to networks created by Github workflows.
This is a follow-up on the discussion in
(#1046)[https://github.com/actions-runner-controller/actions-runner-controller/issues/1046]
and uses a separate image since there might be some unintended
side-effects with this approach.
* fixup! feat: Add container to propagate host network MTU
Co-authored-by: Yusuke Kuoka <ykuoka@gmail.com>
This introduces a linter to PRs to help with code reviews and code hygiene. I've also gone ahead and fixed (or ignored) the existing lints.
I've only setup the default linters right now. There are many more options that are documented at https://golangci-lint.run/.
The GitHub Action should add appropriate annotations to the lint job for the PR. Contributors can also lint locally using `make lint`.
I think we should at least recommend the reporter read the troubleshooting guide before submitting a bug report. It would give them more chances to realize it isn't a bug in some cases.
Even though we have a bug report form, we've seen so many issues being written in freestyle and I think every occurrence of it resulted in needing multiple hops for us to gather the information necessary for diagnosing the issue. I hope every bug report is more actionable. Now we disable blank issues so that the reporter is likely to choose the bug report form or Discussions depending on their situation.
* [Docs] Move into docs folder and other minor fixes
* Move into [docs] folder
* Fix minor formatting
* Create detailed-docs.md
Moving current Readme contents into a separate detailed-docs.md file. Added one additional section "Getting Started" to have the getting started link. Rest of the file is as is from the current Readme.md
This file would be linked from a new simplified Readme (to be raised a separate PR)
renovate[bot]
Yusuke Kuoka
Nicholas Farley
Vijay-train
Karthik KN
pratikbin
gitulisca
Mike
Saravanan Palanisamy
Tiago Melo
Sebastian N
Cristian Calin
Frederic MARTIN
David Young
Cory Miller
David Girón