docs: add autoscaling also causes problems
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd0092d13f
commit
d26c8d6529
|
|
@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ Under the hood, `RunnerSet` relies on Kubernetes's `StatefulSet` and Mutating We
|
||||||
**Limitations**
|
**Limitations**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* For autoscaling the `RunnerSet` kind only supports pull driven scaling or the `workflow_job` event for webhook driven scaling.
|
* For autoscaling the `RunnerSet` kind only supports pull driven scaling or the `workflow_job` event for webhook driven scaling.
|
||||||
* Whilst RunnerSets support all runner modes as well as autoscaling, currently PVs are **NOT** automatically cleaned up as they are still bound to their respective PVCs when a runner is deleted by the controller. This has **major** implications when using RunnerSets in the standard runner mode, `ephemeral: true`, see [persistent runners](#persistent-runners) for more details. As a result of this, using the default configuration, you will get a build up of PVCs and PVs if you deploy RunnerSets as ephemeral runners without some sort of custom solution for cleaning up the PVCs.
|
* Whilst RunnerSets support all runner modes as well as autoscaling, currently PVs are **NOT** automatically cleaned up as they are still bound to their respective PVCs when a runner is deleted by the controller. This has **major** implications when using RunnerSets in the standard runner mode, `ephemeral: true`, see [persistent runners](#persistent-runners) for more details. As a result of this, using the default configuration or implementing autoscaling, you will get a build up of PVCs and PVs if you deploy RunnerSets as ephemeral runners without some sort of custom solution for cleaning up the PVCs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Persistent Runners
|
### Persistent Runners
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue